Clause 6.2 requires your ISMS to have documented information security objectives — and a plan for how to achieve them. The security objectives register is where objective, metric, responsibility, and deadline converge. Without this register, information security remains an intention without direction.
What does it contain?
The template maps the requirements of Clause 6.2 directly into columns:
- Objective — what should be achieved? (e.g. reduce mean time to recovery to < 4 hours)
- Policy reference — which principle of the information security policy does this objective support?
- Metric / KPI — how is progress measured? (e.g. MTTR in hours, training completion rate in percent)
- Target value — what value should be reached?
- Responsible person — who drives achievement of the objective?
- Resources — what is needed? (budget, personnel, tools)
- Deadline — by when should the objective be achieved?
- Status — current degree of fulfilment
How to use the template
1. Formulate objectives. Derive them from three sources: the information security policy (Clause 5.2), the risk assessment (Clause 6.1), and stakeholder requirements (Clause 4.2). Each objective should have a clear link to at least one of these sources.
2. Define metrics. For each objective: which KPI shows progress? Availability percentage, number of security incidents, mean response time, training completion rate, patch cycle time. Choose metrics you can actually collect — with the data available to you.
3. Set responsibilities and deadlines. An objective without a responsible person and a deadline is a wish. Every row in the register needs both.
4. Present in the management review. Clause 9.3 requires that the results of security objectives are addressed in the management review. The register is the basis for this discussion — bring it up to date.
5. Adjust annually. Objectives that have been met are replaced by new ones. Objectives that were missed are analysed: was it resources, the target value, or the implementation? This analysis belongs in the management review minutes.
| ID | Ziel | Verknüpfte ISO-Klausel / Risiko | Verantwortlich | Messgröße | Baseline (Jahresanfang) | Zielwert | Messfrequenz | Aktueller Wert | Status | Prüfdatum | Verknüpfte Maßnahme | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBJ-2026-01 | Phishing-Simulations-Klickrate unter 5 % senken | ISO 6.2 + R-002 | ISB | % Mitarbeitende | die simuliertes Phishing anklicken | 5 | 8 % (2025-12) | <5 % bis 2026-12-31 | Quartalsweise | 4 | 2 % (2026-Q1) | |||
| OBJ-2026-02 | 100 % phishing-resistente MFA für alle Admin-Konten erreichen | ISO 6.2 + R-001 + R-002 | ISB | % Admin-Konten mit FIDO2 | 0 % (2025-12) | 100 % bis 2026-06-30 | Monatlich | 48 % (2026-04) | Auf Kurs | 2026-06-30 | RTP-001 | |||
| OBJ-2026-03 | FIDO2 für alle Mitarbeitenden ausrollen | ISO 6.2 + R-002 | ISB | % Mitarbeitende mit FIDO2 ausgestattet | 0 % (2025-12) | 100 % bis 2026-09-30 | Monatlich | 12 % (2026-04) | Auf Kurs | 2026-09-30 | RTP-004 | |||
| OBJ-2026-04 | Alle kritischen und hohen Schwachstellen in zwei aufeinanderfolgenden Quartalen innerhalb SLA schließen | ISO 6.2 + A.8.8 | IT-Betriebsleitung | % Schwachstellen innerhalb SLA geschlossen | 89 % (2025-Q4) | 100 % in 2026-Q3 und Q4 | Monatlich | 92 % (2026-Q1) | Hinter Plan | 2026-09-30 | CAPA-2026-004 | |||
| OBJ-2026-05 | Externes Überwachungsaudit ohne schwerwiegende Feststellungen bestehen | ISO 9.2 + 9.3 | ISB | Anzahl schwerwiegender Feststellungen | 1 (Audit 2025) | 0 in 2026 | Jährlich | Audit ausstehend | Ausstehend | 2026-05-18 | ||||
| OBJ-2026-06 | Awareness-Schulungs-Abschlussquote auf über 95 % erhöhen | A.6.3 | HR-Leitung | % Mitarbeitende | die jährliches Awareness-Training abschließen | 93 % (2025) | >95 % bis 2026-12-31 | Quartalsweise | 96 % (2026-Q1) | Erreicht | 2026-12-31 | |||
| OBJ-2026-07 | Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) für Sicherheitsvorfälle unter 2 Stunden senken | ISO 6.2 + A.5.25 | ISB | Stunden vom Vorfall bis zur Erkennung (Median) | 2 h 45 min (2025) | <2 h bis 2026-12-31 | Quartalsweise | 1 h 35 min (2026-Q1) | Erreicht | 2026-12-31 | ||||
| OBJ-2026-08 | Zweiten Logistik-SaaS-Anbieter als Standby qualifizieren | R-004 + A.5.30 | Einkauf | Anbieter qualifiziert (ja/nein) | Nein | Ja bis 2026-12-31 | Quartalsweise | Anbieter-Shortlist vereinbart | Auf Kurs | 2026-12-31 | RTP-008 | |||
| OBJ-2026-09 | 100 % Lieferanten-Sicherheitsprüfung für kritische Lieferanten erreichen | A.5.22 | Einkauf | % kritische Lieferanten innerhalb 12 Monaten geprüft | 80 % (2025) | 100 % bis 2026-12-31 | Quartalsweise | 92 % (2026-Q1) | Auf Kurs | 2026-12-31 | ||||
| OBJ-2026-10 | Zwei BCM-Übungen pro Jahr für kritische Prozesse durchführen | A.5.29 + A.5.30 | BCM-Leitung | Anzahl Übungen pro Jahr | 1 (2025) | 2 bis 2026-12-31 | Jährlich | 1 abgeschlossen (2026-Q2) | Auf Kurs | 2026-12-31 |
| ID | Objective | Linked ISO Clause / Risk | Owner | Metric | Baseline (start of year) | Target | Measurement Frequency | Current Value | Status | Review Date | Linked Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBJ-2026-01 | Reduce phishing simulation click rate below 5% | ISO 6.2 + R-002 | ISO | % of users clicking simulated phishing | 5.8% (2025-12) | <5% by 2026-12-31 | Quarterly | 4.2% (2026-Q1) | On track | 2026-06-30 | RTP-005 |
| OBJ-2026-02 | Achieve 100% phishing-resistant MFA for all admin accounts | ISO 6.2 + R-001 + R-002 | ISO | % of admin accounts on FIDO2 | 0% (2025-12) | 100% by 2026-06-30 | Monthly | 48% (2026-04) | On track | 2026-06-30 | RTP-001 |
| OBJ-2026-03 | Roll out FIDO2 to all staff | ISO 6.2 + R-002 | ISO | % of users with FIDO2 enrolled | 0% (2025-12) | 100% by 2026-09-30 | Monthly | 12% (2026-04) | On track | 2026-09-30 | RTP-004 |
| OBJ-2026-04 | Close all critical and high vulnerabilities within SLA for two consecutive quarters | ISO 6.2 + A.8.8 | IT Operations Lead | % of vulns closed within SLA | 89% (2025-Q4) | 100% in 2026-Q3 and Q4 | Monthly | 92% (2026-Q1) | Behind | 2026-09-30 | CAPA-2026-004 |
| OBJ-2026-05 | Pass external surveillance audit with no major findings | ISO 9.2 + 9.3 | ISO | Number of major findings | 1 (2025 audit) | 0 in 2026 | Annual | Pending audit | Pending | 2026-05-18 | |
| OBJ-2026-06 | Increase awareness training completion above 95% | A.6.3 | HR Lead | % of staff completing annual awareness training | 93% (2025) | >95% by 2026-12-31 | Quarterly | 96% (2026-Q1) | Achieved | 2026-12-31 | |
| OBJ-2026-07 | Reduce mean time to detect (MTTD) for security incidents below 2 hours | ISO 6.2 + A.5.25 | ISO | Hours from incident occurrence to detection (median) | 2h 45min (2025) | <2h by 2026-12-31 | Quarterly | 1h 35min (2026-Q1) | Achieved | 2026-12-31 | |
| OBJ-2026-08 | Qualify a second logistics SaaS provider as standby | R-004 + A.5.30 | Procurement | Provider qualified (yes/no) | No | Yes by 2026-12-31 | Quarterly | Vendor shortlist agreed | On track | 2026-12-31 | RTP-008 |
| OBJ-2026-09 | Achieve 100% supplier security review coverage for critical suppliers | A.5.22 | Procurement | % of critical suppliers reviewed within 12 months | 80% (2025) | 100% by 2026-12-31 | Quarterly | 92% (2026-Q1) | On track | 2026-12-31 | |
| OBJ-2026-10 | Run two BCM exercises per year for critical processes | A.5.29 + A.5.30 | BCM Lead | Number of exercises per year | 1 (2025) | 2 by 2026-12-31 | Annual | 1 completed (2026-Q2) | On track | 2026-12-31 |
Sources
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 6.2 — Information security objectives and planning to achieve them
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 9.3 — Management review